Electoral reform for the UK? Don’t bet on it - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
英国政治

Electoral reform for the UK? Don’t bet on it

Fractured party politics and enthusiasm from Labour’s hopefuls are not a sign of imminent proportional voting
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.6,"text":"The writer is professor of politics at Queen Mary University London and co-author of ‘The British General Election of 2024’"}],[{"start":13.75,"text":"Excitement among advocates of electoral reform has been building, buoyed up by the possibility that Andy Burnham may take over as UK prime minister. This is understandable — he’s an enthusiast too, and the fracturing of our party politics makes it look inevitable — but they shouldn’t get ahead of themselves. For good or ill, anyone hoping to see a shift from first past the post to proportional representation before the next general election, and without a referendum, is fooling themselves."}],[{"start":42.15,"text":"Burnham’s support for electoral reform is seemingly genuine. At last year’s Labour Party conference he told a rally: “There is nothing more unstoppable than an idea whose time has come — and PR’s time has come.” Last week, he confirmed that he was “committed to proportional representation”, being unable to see how “first past the post and the point-scoring inherent within it lifts Britain out of the doom loop it is in”."}],[{"start":65.6,"text":"So far, so promising, not least because he (like me) supports creating a national commission to promote an evidence-based UK-wide conversation on the issue. But the idea that this process would prompt the introduction of PR in time to elect the next crop of MPs — presuming a putative Burnham government holds off calling an election until 2029 — is outlandish."}],[{"start":86.19999999999999,"text":"It’s not just a question of logistics — though they would be formidable even if the government were to pursue a purely parliamentary path to legislating for the form of PR eventually agreed upon (various systems are already used in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and will soon be reintroduced for mayoralties). The Commons, predictable Conservative opposition notwithstanding, might just wear it. But the House of Lords, packed with Conservative peers instinctively opposed and crossbenchers committed to detailed scrutiny? No chance."}],[{"start":118.6,"text":"It’s also the vibes. A rushed job would inevitably court accusations that change was motivated less by a concern to create an electoral system better suited to what looks increasingly like a permanent shift to five- or six-party politics than a desperate attempt to prevent Nigel Farage from entering Number 10."}],[{"start":137.65,"text":"One could argue that Farage would not object: he has been arguing for PR longer than Burnham has. Now he seems to have cooled on the idea — with his Reform UK party currently winning locally under FPTP, it’s no longer his enemy but his friend."}],[{"start":153.20000000000002,"text":"It’s a pound to a penny, then, that if Labour and other parties in the UK’s left-liberal bloc (the Liberal Democrats, Greens, Scottish National Party and Plaid Cymru) were to ram reform through parliament, Farage could argue yet again that “the establishment” was denying “the will of the people”."}],[{"start":170.65,"text":"These parties should instead make a manifesto commitment to whatever system a national commission might recommend. Then, should they manage to form a government from whatever crazy set of results FPTP produces next time, they could at least claim a collective mandate for change."}],[{"start":186.45000000000002,"text":"It probably wouldn’t be enough. Britons might balk at the idea of another referendum, given how bitterly divisive the 2016 Brexit and 2014 Scottish independence votes turned out to be. But those exercises in direct democracy (along with the 2011 vote that rejected a far less comprehensive change to the electoral system) have set a precedent when deciding major constitutional issues — one that is difficult to override."}],[{"start":210.50000000000003,"text":"So, while reformers may welcome the possibility of Burnham becoming prime minister, celebration would be premature. Better, by far, to get real: step up efforts to set up a truly independent commission, agree to back the system it recommends, insert a commitment into as many party manifestos as possible and begin working out how best to win support in what is bound to be a hard-fought public vote."}],[{"start":241.90000000000003,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1780538738_9844.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×