America’s economic war on Iran has a China problem - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

America’s economic war on Iran has a China problem

The US cannot fully isolate Tehran unless other trade partners co-operate
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.24,"text":"At the weekend, US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent evoked the Normandy landings to describe the financial offensive Washington intended to unleash on Iran as “economic D-Day”. In the event, it seemed more like a series of warning shots fired from far offshore. The campaign to turn Iran into an “economic outcast” is, moreover, not one the US can fully accomplish on its own, but requires co-operation from Tehran’s main trading partners. The biggest of those, China, has already signalled little intention to play ball. And as Bessent acknowledged, moving too quickly with US secondary sanctions on countries that do not comply could “blow up the global financial system”."}],[{"start":46.56,"text":"When America and Israel launched their war against Iran six months ago, they mistakenly calculated that the regime, battered by a 12-day Israeli-US assault the previous June and deeply unpopular at home after a brutal crackdown on protests, was close to collapse. Now that the bombing has failed to force Tehran’s “unconditional surrender”, or achieve the more recent goal of persuading Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, US President Donald Trump is again turning to economic pressure in the hope of finishing the job."}],[{"start":76.16,"text":"The problem for Washington is that Iran has been under multiple layers of sanctions for years — and since last September under UN measures reimposed over Tehran’s breaches of the 2015 nuclear agreement that Trump exited in his first term. There is little left within the republic to target directly. As a result, the new US effort aims to cut Iran off from trade links — in aviation, shipping, digital assets, gold and technology, as well as oil — with its main commercial partners, which include China, the United Arab Emirates and Turkey."}],[{"start":107.28,"text":"The UAE, a US ally and the largest seller of goods to Iran, already said last week it was suspending trade and commercial ties after accusing Tehran of firing two ballistic missiles towards its territory. But Beijing, which buys up to 90 per cent of Iran’s oil, on Tuesday warned the US it would retaliate if Chinese companies were included in secondary sanctions relating to Iran. Any significant increase in US sanctions on China could torpedo delicate trade negotiations only a month before Trump and China’s Xi Jinping are due to meet in Washington."}],[{"start":139.86,"text":"Even if the US did manage to impose significant new economic pain on Iran, there is no guarantee this would force Tehran’s capitulation. After two wars in the past year damaged its industrial capacity and left inflation running at between 80 and 90 per cent, Iran’s economy is in a far deeper crisis than when Trump launched his first “maximum pressure” campaign in 2018. But the Islamic regime, made more hardline by the conflict, believes it is in a battle for its survival — only increasing its defiance. There are no signs yet that long-suffering Iranian citizens are about to take to the streets. Any popular uprising would probably be met by another crackdown — despite Bessent’s call for Iranian soldiers to question where the country’s leadership is taking it."}],[{"start":188.72,"text":"Indeed, were US pressure to start having an impact, the Iranian regime might choose to escalate, as it has threatened, and begin striking energy infrastructure across the Gulf to raise the costs to the global economy. If US efforts fail, by contrast, the risk is that Trump chooses to escalate again as he strives to break out of the current impasse ahead of November’s midterm elections."}],[{"start":212.24,"text":"The most positive aspect of Washington’s new effort to isolate Iran economically is that it suggests that the US president has little appetite to escalate militarily for now. Given its low chance of ending the deadlock, however, “Operation Economic Outcast” amounts to another risky gamble on a road that, for both sides, ultimately has to lead back to the negotiating table."}],[{"start":238.44,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1787728435_4256.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

一周展望:日本央行担心通胀超调有没有道理?

《市场前瞻》是英国《金融时报》的未来一周市场情况指南。

科技巨头用担保工具将3000亿美元AI敞口移至表外

华尔街找到新途径,将科技巨头的信用优势转化为更低成本的资金,以支持AI基础设施建设。

无人驾驶出租车冲击重要岗位

克拉克:坐在后座的我们往往看不到出租车司机这份工作的诸多好处。

特朗普称美国已与丹麦达成协议,以取得对格陵兰安全事务的“控制”

丹麦政府表示,协议最早下周即可签署,并将尊重该地区的主权。

特朗普禁止美国主要新闻媒体进入白宫

总统禁止CNN、MS NOW和《政客》参与报道,进一步加大对媒体的打压。

导弹和无人机袭击加剧,沙特拉响空袭警报

也门胡塞武装重新点燃冲突以来,沙特当局首次在首都发布警告
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×