Britain’s defence investment predicament - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT观点

Britain’s defence investment predicament

After months of wrangling, Starmer’s military funding plan still came up short
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.62,"text":"Britain’s long-delayed defence investment plan is one of the last big announcements from outgoing prime minister Sir Keir Starmer. It exemplifies the inability of his cabinet to face up adequately to the hard choices of government. The plan has been spruced up since the resignation earlier this month of defence secretary John Healey (which helped seal Starmer’s fate); the extra spending over the next four years is upped by £1.5bn to £15bn. Yet Healey’s criticism holds true: the long-delayed plan remains well short of what was required. The presumptive next prime minister, Andy Burnham, will somehow need to find more money."}],[{"start":43.32,"text":"The shape of the plan shows lessons have been learned from how the Ukraine and Iran conflicts have reshaped war. Some £5bn will be invested into a “drone transformation” to deliver uncrewed and autonomous weapons for all services. Rather than ageing destroyers and frigates being replaced, the navy will procure six “hybrid” vessels designed as mother ships for uncrewed systems."}],[{"start":65.64,"text":"A necessary balance is struck with continuing to fund the broader spectrum of capabilities, including high-end projects such as the Aukus submarine project. But military experts warn of an excessive focus on long-term programmes designed to counter Chinese capabilities and project power into the Asia-Pacific, rather than preparing to fight — or preferably deter — a conflict with Russia, which Nato has warned could happen by 2030."}],[{"start":90.84,"text":"Starmer rightly insisted that ensuring the investment is effective will require a revamp of shambolic procurement procedures that have resulted in defence spending being seen as a “bottomless pit”. Too much money has been wasted on mishandled projects such as the £6.3bn Ajax armoured vehicle programme. The investment in drones will also require setting up a new ecosystem of technological development and manufacturing capacity."}],[{"start":115.8,"text":"The prime minister claimed to have made hard choices by sacrificing some road and energy investments to boost the defence package. Yet his plan still falls far below the additional £28bn that defence officials warned was needed to fully fund all 62 recommendations of last year’s Strategic Defence Review, which the government accepted."}],[{"start":135.56,"text":"The year-long hiatus between the review and the investment plan intended to fund it also created a vacuum of uncertainty that has put a heavy strain on the UK defence industrial base, especially the agile start-ups needed to deliver innovative technologies. Neither the speed of action nor the amount of investment has matched the urgency of the rhetoric."}],[{"start":154.76,"text":"UK defence spending is now projected to reach 2.7 per cent of GDP by 2029-30. But hitting 3 per cent is only a “priority” for the next multiyear spending plan and the commitment to hit the 3.5 per cent Nato target by 2035 is vague. That trajectory will turn Britain, long a Nato frontrunner on defence spending as a proportion of GDP, into a mid-tier country behind Poland, Germany, and the Baltic and Nordic nations. All are closer to Russia than Britain, but the UK has no less a responsibility to protect its citizens and prepare for a conflict that would drag in all Nato members. If Britain is to continue to provide the diplomatic leadership that has been one of Starmer’s strengths on issues such as Ukraine, moreover, it will have to show it is ready to contribute its share towards Europe’s defence."}],[{"start":205.84,"text":"Starmer suggested Burnham could use the defence plan as a “platform” to find more funding, but warned that the idea of “defence bonds”, circulating in Whitehall, was still a form of borrowing that could push up interest rates. In reality, the new premier will have to make savings, for example, from the soaring welfare budget. Whether he can succeed here, where the outgoing UK leader has failed, will be a defining test of the Burnham premiership."}],[{"start":230.76,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1782879268_4521.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

能源危机加剧,燃料补贴拖累公共财政

过去四个月,出台燃料补贴以保护消费者免受价格飙升影响的国家数量增加了一倍多,各国财政压力进一步加重。

全球最火热股市为何反成韩国之累

韩国股价的剧烈波动正在损害国家形象。

必须采用不同方式监管金融领域的AI

在我们急于监管之前,我们应该思考如何不剥夺这项工具的益处,又管理好其造成伤害的风险。

他会成为印度尼西亚下一任总统吗?

德迪•穆利亚迪在社交媒体上的高度活跃,帮助他与选民建立起深厚联系。在许多人眼中,他是一个真正贴近民众的“自己人”。
8小时前

多边主义不是理想主义,而是现实必需

我们需要加强现有合作体系,而不是另起炉灶。

一周展望:日本央行担心通胀超调有没有道理?

投资者正评估日本央行将以多大力度继续加息,以及该行能否跑赢曲线,从而遏制通胀、支撑日元。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×