The global economy and the art of living dangerously - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
专栏 全球经济

The global economy and the art of living dangerously

It would be nice to think that the world will become less shock-prone, but it probably won’t
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.32,"text":"The past few days have reminded us of one of the two chief contemporary economic realities: the president of the US is a wrecker. Yet this is consistent with the other reality, which is that despite the disruptions and shocks of our era, the world economy remains a powerful growth machine, driven by remarkable innovations, risk-taking finance and large accumulations of debt. Can this last? The reason for believing that it will is that growth has been the dominant feature of the global economy since the middle of the last century. Yet we must always remember that growth is one thing, but stable growth quite another."}],[{"start":44.04,"text":"What, then, is the latest Donald Trump outrage? First, he started a war on Iran, without a plan, which has raised diesel prices in the US and worldwide. Then, a few days ago, he made a deal with Vladimir Putin to release Russian diesel on global markets, in violation of sanctions imposed after Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. Trump also told Kyiv to halt its strikes on Russian oil refineries and threatened to cut off intelligence sharing with Ukraine and access to US-made weapons. This “deal” is both foolish and wicked: foolish, because it is too small to lower diesel prices significantly, and wicked, because it is prepared to sacrifice a country that is struggling heroically to be free from tyranny."}],[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":85.36,"text":"Current US policymaking is not just reckless and immoral. It is also one of the causes of the world’s unpredictability. Thus, the IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook (WEO) starts with the following comment from Silvana Tenreyro, the new economic counsellor: “In less than seven years, the global economy has been subjected to an exceptional sequence of events.” Yet all but one of these shocks, the exception being the pandemic, are man-made, or perhaps “strongman-made”. The others are the war in Ukraine, the tariff war and the war in the Middle East. Putin launched the first of these in 2022. Trump, of course, began the other two."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":125.3,"text":"These shocks have, as Tenreyro says, “tested the resilience of households, firms, financial markets, and governments. Individually, each of these major developments would have been considered unlikely. Their confluence over such a short period of time is even more extraordinary.” Yet, remarkably, the WEO’s forecasts for growth this year and next, at 3.1 and 3.4 per cent respectively, are “broadly unchanged from April”, despite more persistent energy disruption than was then expected. Global inflation is, however, expected to hit 4.7 per cent this year, as a result of higher commodity prices, and 4.1 per cent in 2027. But, happily, “the pass-through to core inflation is expected to be limited”."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":170.04,"text":"The explanations for this resilience are familiar. They include adjustment of exports and imports away from direct trade between the US and China. More recently, however, the dominant factors have been the flexibility of the global energy economy, discussed here last week, and the investment boom triggered by AI. Yet neither is guaranteed to last. As Nick Butler points out, stocks of crude and products are low after six months of drawdowns. Moreover, “product exports of diesel and jet fuel [from the Gulf] remain minimal”. Also at risk are supplies of naphtha, urea and liquefied natural gas (the latter of special importance to Europe). The AI investment boom also concentrates risk. Even if AI itself works out, the level of investment is likely to stop growing, if not decline, at some point. Moreover, AI might not work out financially on the hoped-for scale at all. (See charts.)"}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":221.68,"text":"Other fragilities are evident, notably the fiscal positions. Despite the big post-pandemic rise in real and nominal interest rates, most large economies continue to run significant primary fiscal deficits (before interest payments). The US position stands out, with a forecast primary fiscal deficit of 4.8 per cent of GDP this year, a share of T-bill issuance in gross borrowing at 58 per cent and an average maturity of a mere 5.9 years."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":248.96,"text":"The WEO rightly emphasises the importance of rebuilding fiscal space. The good news is that, in today’s circumstances, the negative impact of structural fiscal tightening is likely to be offset by lower real and nominal interest rates. But redressing global current accounts imbalances will also be essential. That must, at last, involve China."}],[{"start":null,"text":"
"}],[{"start":270.68,"text":"The WEO emphasises other downside risks, including a worsening of the ongoing wars, (probably AI-enhanced) cyber threats and climate catastrophes. Neither a stock market crash nor a collapse in AI-related investment can be ruled out, should returns on AI disappoint. Upside economic risks include still faster progress with AI technology, though that could also inflict devastating social consequences. Another plausible upside is an accelerated energy transition, as recent events underline the unreliability of fossil fuels. Given their physical location, these are bound to remain so for many countries. The WEO notes that the ability to exploit AI and meet energy needs reliably will be crucial for growth prospects. Sadly, the world’s poorest countries are particularly vulnerable in both respects. Thus, the WEO rightly fears that their living standards are likely to fall still further behind those in richer countries."}],[{"start":326.52,"text":"It would be good to believe the world will become less prone to shocks. But it will probably not do so. The best response is to strengthen fundamentals, notably economic flexibility and dynamism, together with energy resilience. In this context, as the WEO notes, it is essential to make support for people vulnerable to shocks targeted and temporary. The time for throwing public money around freely has come to an end. It would help if the shocks stopped, too. Alas, given our leaders, I would not bet on that."}],[{"start":359.94,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1791969502_9737.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。

FT社评:AI信贷市场寒意渐浓

投资者要求更高回报,才愿意为数据中心建设热潮提供融资。
1天前
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×