The new nuclear arms race - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
战争

The new nuclear arms race

Amid loose talk of resuming weapons tests, cold war-era controls are unravelling
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.69,"text":"Donald Trump’s statement last week that the US would resume testing nuclear weapons “on an equal basis” with Russia and China wrongfooted his own officials as much as it did Beijing and Moscow. Restarting warhead tests would break a three-decade moratorium by the major nuclear powers. Coming after Russia’s Vladimir Putin bragged of two new weapons delivery systems, it bolstered concerns that the world is sliding into a new nuclear arms race — when much of the cold war-era arms control architecture has collapsed."}],[{"start":43.339999999999996,"text":"Trump’s comments appeared primarily a response to Putin’s claims to have tested two nuclear-powered delivery platforms: Burevestnik, a long-range cruise missile, and Poseidon, a torpedo said to be able to devastate coastal regions with a radioactive tidal wave. Russia’s president said both could evade existing defences, in a swipe at Trump’s plan to expand today’s US missile defence system into an elaborate “Golden Dome”."}],[{"start":74.03,"text":"Trump may have intended to signal the US would step up testing of delivery systems, not warheads. In a weekend TV interview, though, he appeared to confirm that he meant explosive nuclear testing. His energy secretary said the US would simply continue systems tests involving “non-nuclear explosions”."}],[{"start":97.72,"text":"Whatever the truth, a return to US warhead testing would be a highly retrograde step. It would provide cover to do likewise not just for Russia and China but other nuclear states keen to upgrade their weapons. That could encourage non-nuclear states to pursue their own."}],[{"start":119.87,"text":"It would also demolish one of the few remaining pillars of US-Russian arms control. Agreements limiting missile defence systems (intended to buttress mutual deterrence) and intermediate-range missiles are no longer in force. The New Start treaty, limiting deployed strategic warheads to 1,550 on each side, is due to expire next February. Putin has offered a conditional one-year extension; Washington has made positive noises but not formally responded."}],[{"start":153.25,"text":"The erosion of arms control, rush for new systems and loose talk on testing are all the more unsettling since Russia’s war on Ukraine has marked the return of nuclear blackmail. Putin has used it from the outset to deter Nato countries from intervening and supplying the most lethal weapons to Kyiv. Chillingly, US intelligence estimated at 50-50 the chance that Moscow would carry out a threat to use a nuclear weapon when Russian forces were losing ground in Ukraine in late 2022."}],[{"start":190.5,"text":"The decades-old strategic balance between the two nuclear superpowers threatens to be upset, meanwhile, by China’s rise as an atomic power. The Pentagon estimates Beijing’s armoury could swell from about 600 warheads to more than 1,000 by 2030. Trump has insisted China should join future arms control agreements; US officials worry that, in terms of deployed warheads allowed by New Start, Russia’s arsenal plus China’s could soon dwarf its own. Beijing has rejected joining talks, arguing it has far fewer weapons."}],[{"start":233.29,"text":"Despite its resistance to caps on its warheads, however, it is in China’s interest to take part in efforts to avert a senseless, multilateral, new arms race. Beijing is already understood to have privately urged restraint after Putin’s 2022 threats. Nuclear weapons are not only abhorrent for their fearsome power, but ruinously expensive."}],[{"start":259.99,"text":"Whatever Trump’s justifiable frustrations with Putin in his efforts to end the Ukraine war and regardless of China’s position today, the US president ought to engage with Moscow on extending New Start as a step towards rebuilding arms control. He has previously called that a priority. Making decisive progress towards it would be a far better way of earning the Nobel Peace Prize he craves than ending the long taboo on weapons testing."}],[{"start":300.58000000000004,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1762337692_8671.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Anthropic如何在AI编程取得突破并撼动商业格局

新的人工智能驱动工具正在压缩软件开发的时间与成本,并对从法律到广告等行业构成威胁。

并非所有软件都面临相同的AI威胁

从安全服务到能够彻底改造的公司,许多企业或许都能在“AI末日大决战”中存活下来。

李开复:为何中国将在消费级AI领域击败美国

这位中国人工智能先驱谈到了AI领域两大强国之间的竞争,以及企业为何需要更积极主动地采用AI技术。

据信俄罗斯间谍航天器已拦截欧洲关键卫星通信

欧洲安全官员认为,莫斯科正将未加密的欧洲通信内容作为攻击目标。

印度欢迎特朗普的“协议”,但回避讨论俄油禁令

分析人士对美国总统声称莫迪已承诺停止购买俄罗斯原油一事深表怀疑。

特斯拉能自己造芯片吗?

与火星殖民或神经植入等项目相比,建设芯片制造厂更扎根于现有的工业实践。但历史表明此类冒险举措尤其容易导致价值破坏。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×