The anatomy of a corporate turnaround - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
罗尔斯-罗伊斯

The anatomy of a corporate turnaround

Reviving a struggling business requires skill, luck and adaptability

Investors are cashing in on Rolls-Royce’s turnaround story. The British engine makers’ profits more than doubled last year, with Tufan Erginbilgiç taking the helm in January 2023. Dividend payments are set to resume, and its share price is up over 60 per cent this year alone. The former BP executive, who shook up the company’s top teams, reduced duplication and culled middle managers must be pleased with himself. But he also knows how fragile the gains can be. He said Rolls-Royce’s midterm targets are a “milestone, not a destination”.

Restoring the feelgood factor, for managers, staff and shareholders, plays a vital part in the revival of any struggling enterprise. Some of the best known names in business have undergone their own revamps — from Apple to Ford to Xerox. Citigroup under Jane Fraser is another example of a turnaround under way. Purging the leadership, shrinking the headcount or rolling out some new technology alone is not enough to transform a faltering company. So what should a business do?

Having a clear grip of the level of distress is essential if a leader is to understand what type of turnaround their company needs. Is it a rescue, like BP, which was on the brink of collapse after the Deepwater Horizon disaster? Or a strategic shift, as at Netflix, which moved from rental DVDs to streaming? And which underlying strengths can a leader still exploit? 

Often fresh blood is required at the top. Whether the chief executive is an insider or outsider, has a genial disposition or a blunter leadership style, they need to have a clear vision of what success looks like, an unyielding resolve to inspire a renewed sense of purpose and a determination to execute their plan. Boards have a critical role in choosing the right person to lead an organisation, but it is the CEO and executive teams that do the heavy lifting. 

When a company has lost its way because of poor debt management and bad spending decisions, financial restructuring is likely to be unavoidable. Cutting costs, finding efficiencies and boosting productivity are central to improving operations. But getting control of the balance sheet while not choking off future growth is a challenge. Business strategies may need adjusting, too. As some companies’ actions during the pandemic showed, crises require rapid adaptation and shifts in demand may force businesses to ditch once-core products or services. Delaying necessary change will only haunt the business later.

No turnaround is possible without restoring employee confidence, which is as vital as bringing investors back on side. Every level of an organisation needs to buy into a transformation. Indeed, a cultural turnaround may be just as crucial as fixing the day-to-day machinery of a business. Satya Nadella, for example, revived Microsoft by turning staff into “learn-it-alls” instead of “know-it-alls”, fostering a growth mindset across the business.

This is where a CEO’s interpersonal skills matter. Leaders who are closing divisions, firing staff and diverting resources need to communicate these tough decisions and the reasons behind them clearly and with the utmost care. 

Luck plays its part, of course. Rolls-Royce’s turnaround efforts have coincided with the revival of defence sector spending and recruitment. Data shows CEOs that have led successful transformations are not always able to replicate their wins elsewhere. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all model. Erginbilgiç’s tough approach — he called Rolls-Royce a “burning platform” soon after joining to instil urgency in his staff — may be working. But will he have to shift his leadership style for calmer times? A well-executed turnaround does not guarantee success forever. The leaders that triumph are the ones who can adapt.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

谷歌为Anthropic打造的2000亿美元华尔街融资机器

私募信贷、芯片租赁和数据中心担保,支撑起AI支出的全新庞大模式。

“日元干预”等于“美国自保”

美国联手日本支撑日元,不只是出于盟友情谊,更是为了避免日本加息或美国国债遭抛售、导致美债收益率进一步走高。

“诅咒之岛”:科技游民与诈骗犯藏身的千亿美元奢华开发项目

警方的突击搜查再次打击了马来西亚陷入困境的中资“森林城市”项目的声誉。

问题不在因凡蒂诺

马杜罗:应该将国际足联的监管职能与商业活动分开,其治理应真正做到包容并具有代表性,监督必须真正独立。

俄罗斯扩大“影子”液化天然气船队,应对欧盟禁令

随着明年制裁进一步收紧,越来越多的“影子”船舶将帮助俄罗斯继续出口液化天然气。

阿斯利康与百时美施贵宝:大药企有时也不够大

当资产负债表规模扩大、能够押注潜在重磅药物时,规模才会带来优势。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×