There was nothing here to save Starmer - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 英国政治

There was nothing here to save Starmer

Voters need hope, but so do his MPs — and he did not give them any
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":4.95,"text":"There are precious few speeches in political history that fundamentally alter the landscape. Sir Keir Starmer’s on Monday morning will not be one of them."}],[{"start":14.05,"text":"It wasn’t a bad speech, though Starmer might have made it at any time in the past few years. But it was not one that changed the argument over whether he should be ousted as prime minister. Those who are demanding a “change of direction” or hoping for a glimpse of a different leader will not have found it. "}],[{"start":30.35,"text":"He tried. There would be a change of pace, a redoubling of commitments, Labour would go further, it would go faster. It would speak for the needs of the people who rely on it. There were even a couple of nuggets to cheer his MPs, not least the commitment to renationalising what remains of British Steel. On Europe, Starmer promised much more effort to put the UK back in Europe’s heart but stopped short of rejoining the institutions that would actually do that. "}],[{"start":58.150000000000006,"text":"So those looking for some real red meat will not have found it. Voters need hope, he declared, but so do his MPs and he did not give them any. The best reason for Starmer to stay — that the country simply does not need this now — is not being heard by MPs whose current focus is on the party. "}],[{"start":78.80000000000001,"text":"He was right in one way, when he argued that Labour cannot win as a weaker version of Reform UK or the Greens but only as a stronger version of Labour. Yet the fundamental problem for Labour and Starmer is that voters are not listening to him and therefore it. In many of the areas lost to Reform last week, there is a serious danger that voters have now lost the habit of voting Labour. "}],[{"start":101.55000000000001,"text":"Those who might yet be open to returning to the fold will need permission to give Labour another glance. A change of leader would offer that permission, though it might prove a fleeting respite given that nothing will change the economic fundamentals of the UK and some contenders alarm the bond markets. “Things Can Only Get Better” was a campaign song, not a forecast. "}],[{"start":123.30000000000001,"text":"And yet what is also clear is that many, many Labour MPs are nervous about stepping over the edge into a leadership challenge. They are not sure who will win. Those who want to see Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, in the role need to give him time to find a path back into parliament. So what might delay Starmer’s departure is that raft of MPs who are sure he has to go but not convinced it has to be this week. "}],[{"start":149.35000000000002,"text":"What won’t save him is this speech, or his comment at the weekend that he wants to go on for 10 years, or the decision to bring back Gordon Brown or Harriet Harman as advisers. Those moves probably made things worse, showing the paucity of strategy. "}],[{"start":165.65000000000003,"text":"The one note of substance was the clear indication that Starmer has no intention of making it easy for his opponents. He will not lightly step aside. That could buy him more time, or it could force one of his would-be successors into action. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, has the least to gain from waiting. "}],[{"start":183.95000000000005,"text":"There are good reasons for Labour not to act now. There is no real hurry. The next election is up to three years away. None of the mooted alternatives has offered reason to think they have a serious plan for the country and most are likely to move in a direction of higher taxes, more regulation and more state interference. "}],[{"start":201.05000000000004,"text":"But events may simply have moved too far. What Starmer’s speech showed is that there is probably nothing he can do to save himself beyond refusing to crumble. His best bet now is that he has shown more grit than those who want him out."}],[{"start":215.85000000000005,"text":"The basic calculations still hold. Starmer’s tenure is ebbing away. Britain is heading into another zombie premiership. The blow could fall today, tomorrow, next week or next month. MPs are just weighing the odds and timings they need to get their people in place. The decision is made. It is now only about logistics. "}],[{"start":241.15000000000006,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1778549220_6951.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

乌克兰军火商加码卫星布局,以减少对美依赖

在开发无人机和导弹之后,Fire Point正进军太空领域,尽管公司仍因涉嫌腐败接受调查。

囤积行为加剧伊朗战争引发的经济损害

随着霍尔木兹海峡的对峙进入第三个月,全球各国政府都在艰难应对同一个难题:如何防止囤积者加剧从汽油到注射器等各类产品的短缺。

FT社评:伊朗战争让各国央行进退两难

如果各国央行过早通过加息来遏制通胀压力,可能令本已受创的经济雪上加霜;如但果按兵不动、观望冲突的进展,又可能贻误时机。

反弹的通胀与不耐烦的特朗普:凯文•沃什面临双重压力

美国参议院本周有望批准这位56岁的金融家接替杰伊•鲍威尔出任美联储主席。

伊朗战争推高燃气价格,印度工人纷纷逃离城市生活

伊朗战争推高了烹饪燃料价格,迫使印度许多务工人员返乡回村。

能源、军火与粮食:特朗普对伊战争日益沉重的代价

这场冲突正波及整个美国经济,造成了数千亿美元的产出损失。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×