Europe doesn’t need driverless cars - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
谷歌

Europe doesn’t need driverless cars

The roadways are already safe and robotaxis risk increasing traffic
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":5.85,"text":"The writer is a senior fellow at the MIT Mobility Initiative"}],[{"start":10.5,"text":"Get ready, Europe. The robotaxis are coming. This year, Londoners could see driverless cars from China’s Baidu and Waymo, the self-driving subsidiary of Google’s Alphabet. Tensor Auto and GreenMobility are planning to launch autonomous cars in Copenhagen while Stellantis and Pony.ai want to do the same in Luxembourg. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has voiced her support: “Self-driving cars are already a reality in the United States and China. The same should be true here in Europe.”"}],[{"start":45.03,"text":"She is right about the first part. Autonomous rides are available in Chinese cities like Beijing and Wuhan and in the US, where I live, driverless cars from Waymo, Zoox and Tesla navigate the streets of cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix and Austin. Waymo is reported to provide 450,000 paid trips per week."}],[{"start":69.11,"text":"Driverless journeys can be pleasantly private, albeit too expensive for most people to take them regularly (Waymo rides often cost around a third more than Uber taxis). But to win over regulators and the general public, American robotaxi companies have also presented themselves as an urgently needed solution to the country’s abysmal record of crash deaths. "}],[{"start":95,"text":"Such messaging is of dubious relevance to Europe, however, where roadways are already much safer than those in the US. Furthermore, Europeans are more likely to bike and ride public transportation — travel modes that are vulnerable to a deluge of self-driving cars."}],[{"start":112.53,"text":"So why, exactly, does Europe want robotaxis?"}],[{"start":117.02,"text":"Driverless cars are often perceived as an embodiment of innovation and their developers have long claimed that computers can operate vehicles more safely than humans. They will not drive inebriated, exhausted or distracted."}],[{"start":132.01,"text":"Unaffiliated experts, such as Phil Koopman at Carnegie Mellon, say it is still too soon to know whether robot drivers are really safer. But a technological fix for crashes would be a godsend in the US, where the death count rose by over 25 per cent between 2010 and 2023. An American is more than twice as likely to die in a crash as a Canadian or Korean and more than three times as likely as an Israeli or Spaniard."}],[{"start":164.64,"text":"Europe is in a different situation. Smaller cars, higher transit use and more pedestrianised areas make roads safer. In 2023, the European Union averaged roughly 4.5 crash deaths per 100,000 residents, less than half the American equivalent. Roads in non-EU member states like Britain and Norway were even safer. A handful of Nordic cities like Helsinki have almost eliminated fatal crashes by slowing cars down."}],[{"start":196.48,"text":"This means the upside of robotaxis in Europe is lower. And there are considerable downsides to introducing autonomous cars into transportation networks that do not revolve around motor vehicles. Robotaxis have caused relatively few problems in car-centric American cities like Phoenix. But in San Francisco they have blocked bike lanes and obstructed transit vehicles. Such mishaps should be a warning for European leaders not to let their cities become beholden to the automobile."}],[{"start":232.70999999999998,"text":"Technological marvels they may be, but robotaxis are still cars and cars are a uniquely inefficient means of moving large numbers of people when space is at a premium. By inviting robotaxis into their narrow, busy streets, European cities risk worsening congestion. In California, data shows that Waymos spend almost half their time “deadheading” — driving around empty — which increases traffic. Gridlocked cities would undermine the quality of life and economic productivity that European leaders like von der Leyen want."}],[{"start":268.89,"text":"Robotaxi deployment has been compared to a race — one European carmakers have yet to start. If so, this is a race Europeans should skip altogether."}],[{"start":286.71,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftcn.net.cn/album/a_1767752228_7327.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

Anthropic如何在AI编程取得突破并撼动商业格局

新的人工智能驱动工具正在压缩软件开发的时间与成本,并对从法律到广告等行业构成威胁。

并非所有软件都面临相同的AI威胁

从安全服务到能够彻底改造的公司,许多企业或许都能在“AI末日大决战”中存活下来。

李开复:为何中国将在消费级AI领域击败美国

这位中国人工智能先驱谈到了AI领域两大强国之间的竞争,以及企业为何需要更积极主动地采用AI技术。

据信俄罗斯间谍航天器已拦截欧洲关键卫星通信

欧洲安全官员认为,莫斯科正将未加密的欧洲通信内容作为攻击目标。

印度欢迎特朗普的“协议”,但回避讨论俄油禁令

分析人士对美国总统声称莫迪已承诺停止购买俄罗斯原油一事深表怀疑。

特斯拉能自己造芯片吗?

与火星殖民或神经植入等项目相比,建设芯片制造厂更扎根于现有的工业实践。但历史表明此类冒险举措尤其容易导致价值破坏。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×