Bidenomics wasn’t ambitious enough - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
气候变化

Bidenomics wasn’t ambitious enough

Rapid decarbonisation will require an overhaul of local energy authorities and better macroeconomic planning
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":6.09,"text":"The writer is US programme director of Common Wealth, a think-tank"}],[{"start":11.629999999999999,"text":"The Trump administration has functionally repealed former president Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act. This is not only an immediate blow to US emissions reductions and global Paris agreement targets. It has collapsed the political economic project of the Biden era: building a new pro-green growth agenda with an industrial policy that sought to de-risk climate investment and a fiscal policy aimed at promoting fuller employment."}],[{"start":42.22,"text":"The lesson to take from this is that the Green New Deal movement was right to advocate for a far more ambitious political economy of comprehensive decarbonisation and the guarantee of fundamental economic rights through public provisioning of universal healthcare, housing, education and dignity for all workers."}],[{"start":66.36,"text":"Progressive policymakers will not have another chance to attempt a grand programme of decarbonisation until the end of President Donald Trump’s second term. And they will only have a chance to do so if they can lay the groundwork now by setting an ambitious agenda and defining the political economic project of the post-Trump era."}],[{"start":89.09,"text":"In the future, the US must deliver even more aggressive decarbonisation. This means envisioning a new era of green economic planning: direct public investment, co-ordination and provisioning in key sectors including but not limited to energy and electricity. This is necessary not only for the energy transition, but to ensure universal high quality and affordable provision of life’s essentials, and to maintain macroeconomic stability through an economy-wide restructuring process."}],[{"start":126.78,"text":"The green boom was not technically adequate to deliver decarbonisation. IRA subsidies attempted to bribe generalised private green investment. They were stymied by supply chain snarls, interest rate increases and under-investment in the privately-controlled electricity transmission system."}],[{"start":148.33,"text":"Instead of reviving the IRA’s clean energy tax credits, the US should redesign its power sector by building publicly owned energy infrastructure. As climate writer Robinson Meyer recently noted, it is already clear in the face of electricity inflation that states with publicly owned power authorities such as the New York Power Authority “are able to intervene more forcefully in their own power markets than states that lack such capability . . . because the state itself can act to build its own large-scale power plants”. Their dramatic expansion should be the centrepiece of future power sector policy."}],[{"start":187.88,"text":"Planning is also the prism through which to pursue building progressive macroeconomic policy and decarbonisation governance frameworks. The Biden administration was right to use fiscal spending to pursue a strong labour market recovery post-Covid. But, the experience of supply-side-induced inflation has demonstrated the political limits of uncoordinated growth."}],[{"start":216.32999999999998,"text":"The solution is to co-ordinate growth and economic restructuring to prevent price instability, whether from real bottlenecks or what economist Isabella Weber has called “sellers’ inflation”. The US must build a stronger national macroeconomic planning apparatus from the revival of the Office of Price Administration to a National Investment Authority and a National Economic Planning Board to co-ordinate investment and govern prices."}],[{"start":248.07,"text":"The Green New Deal movement argued that change would not come from a single piece of legislation, but a decade of political contestation. The era of Bidenomics may be over but the fight must continue under Trump. With a president hostile to decarbonisation in the White House, now is the time to shape a future green economic agenda that can protect the environment and guarantee economic security for working people."}],[{"start":283.85999999999996,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1756260645_4134.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

软银追加300亿美元OpenAI投资,考验自身借贷上限

孙正义将巨额资金投入人工智能领域,需要面对投资者的不安情绪。

特朗普能否与伊朗达成协议?

任何结束战争的外交努力都面临重重障碍。

特朗普因新关税计划面临法律挑战

在最高法院裁定先前关税非法后,美国总统转而援引一些鲜为人知的法律。

整顿还是圈地?印尼领导人瞄准资源公司

印尼总统普拉博沃•苏比延多誓言将对违反环境法规的资源企业采取强硬措施。

伊朗战争威胁海湾资金的全球流动

海合会六个成员国数十年来已集体成长为全球金融领域最具影响力的力量之一,投资足迹遍及全球。世界对中东资本的依赖程度比许多人意识到的更深。

一周展望:投资者在押注滞胀吗?

随着全球债市抛售加剧,一种新的忧虑正在占据上风:滞胀。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×