Trump’s reckless attacks on the Fed - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号)。如果该手机号尚未注册,将自动创建 FT中文网账号。短信可能需要几分钟送达,验证码15分钟内有效,请耐心等待:
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议和隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
美国利率

Trump’s reckless attacks on the Fed

The president’s intensifying assault on central bank independence risks backfiring

Donald Trump’s efforts to get the US Federal Reserve to cut interest rates are relentless. The US president has already goaded and threatened the Fed chair Jay Powell. This month he nominated his ally, Stephen Miran, to a vacant board slot. On Monday night, he took a more forceful approach. With unproven allegations of mortgage fraud hovering over governor Lisa Cook, Trump saw an opening, and fired her “effective immediately”, citing his powers to remove her “for cause”. Cook claims “no cause exists under the law” to justify her sacking. A court battle is set to ensue.

Whatever the outcome, the assumption that the Fed will set rates based on its own economic judgments has been dealt a severe blow by Trump’s determination to undermine it. The president has recently called for policy rates to go down to 1 per cent, well below their current perch at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent. He may think this will buoy voters and reduce government borrowing costs. But by undermining the central bank’s credibility he risks making the economic situation worse.

The president’s move against Cook — the first Black woman to serve on the Fed’s board of governors — is unprecedented. Even if she is found guilty of falsifying mortgage statements it is unclear if the courts will deem that sufficient for her to be fired. But, if they did, it could erase any notion that the Fed is independent. Cook has been in support of keeping rates on hold in order to parse the price-raising effects of Trump’s tariff policies. The president could replace her with another pliant governor, and use his insiders to undermine other rate-setters.

With more dovish policymakers in place, rates could fall faster than necessary, raising inflation pressures. At Jackson Hole last week, Powell already opened the door to rate cuts as early as September. But with mounting evidence in recent weeks that import duties are raising domestic price pressures, a rate cut is not set in stone. That may, in part, explain Trump’s drastic actions on Monday.

Either way, in the interim, investors are increasingly pricing in the possibility of a captured Fed. Following Trump’s announcement on Cook, 30-year bond yields — which have remained uncomfortably elevated in the president’s second term — nudged higher. The dollar weakened further too. These market moves are ultimately counter-productive for the president. Higher long-term bond yields push up mortgage rates and public borrowing costs. A weak dollar adds to imported price pressures. If households and businesses expect the president will relentlessly undermine the Fed to get rates down, their inflation expectations may increase. That raises the chances of tariff-related price increases becoming entrenched.

That said, some analysts are concerned that investors aren’t taking Trump’s cumulative threats on the Fed’s independence seriously enough. Although bond yields jumped on Tuesday, they eased back somewhat over the course of the day. It is true that the president’s efforts to exert his influence on the Fed still faces hurdles. Cook’s removal and replacement faces legal wranglings. With 12 individuals on the central bank’s rate-setting committee, there are indeed other further checks and balances.

But investors also have shown signs of being lulled into a false sense of security. The Fed’s independence has been dramatically weakened under Trump’s second term, and the direction of travel under his presidency is clear. The move against Cook shows that his administration will leave no stone unturned in its attempts to cut the cost of credit.

Trump should remember that he was elected, in part, on a wave of public loathing for inflation — precisely what he risks letting loose with tighter control of the Fed. Ultimately, more severe market ructions might be what is needed to force Trump to pull back from causing greater damage to the central bank and the US economy at large.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

美国的清晨,市场的黄昏

罗奇:美国中期选举结果再令人震惊,也阻止不了经济金融周期的转向。

共和党为特朗普的失败政策付出代价

特朗普承诺增加制造业就业岗位、提高美国本土出生人口的就业率,但这两项承诺都未兑现。

“鲁珀特不想和失败者为伍”:默多克的媒体帝国对特朗普态度转冷

共和党遭遇失利后,福克斯新闻主持人质疑对伊朗战争的战略,《纽约邮报》则在头版刊出“蓝色海啸”。

Lex专栏:美国选民给数据中心建设热潮降温,未必是坏事

美国中期选举结果可能影响45%的数据中心扩建计划,但对投资者而言,这未尝不是好消息。

英国移民改革:有哪些变化?谁受益?

根据周一公布的改革计划,高收入者及其雇主可能从中受益,但英国也可能因此吓退国际学生。

电力的隐秘力量

能源转型并不像人们让我们以为的那样不可能。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×