US investors should beware of tariff complacency - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
社评

US investors should beware of tariff complacency

America’s bullish stock market is at odds with Trump’s policy agenda
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":9.38,"text":"After passing his tax-cutting “big, beautiful bill”, Donald Trump has been busy reviving his protectionist agenda. Last week the US president extended the 90-day pause on his “liberation day” import duties until August 1, and wrote punchy letters and social media posts to key trade partners, goading them to strike quick deals with his administration. He also proposed a 50 per cent levy on copper and a 200 per cent charge on pharmaceutical products. Wall Street, however, reacted nonchalantly. The S&P 500 continues to trade close to record highs, over 25 per cent above the lows it dipped to in the aftermath of Trump’s initial April 2 “reciprocal” tariff announcements."}],[{"start":60.71,"text":"With the president’s on-and-off levy declarations, it is indeed difficult to track where US tariff rates are, let alone predict where they will end up. That said, incorporating policy announcements through to July 13, the Yale Budget Lab estimates that the overall US average effective tariff rate could rise to its highest in over a century — and around eight times higher than where it was last year. At these levels, most economists would expect tariff-induced price rises eventually to sap profit margins and growth. If so, the US stock market has not received the message. Risk appetite remains high and valuations are rich."}],[{"start":108.36,"text":"There are two dominant explanations for the bullishness. First, investors have warmed to the idea that the president won’t actually follow through with his worst tariff threats — also known as the “Trump Always Chickens Out”, or “Taco”, trade. The president certainly has form in postponing or cancelling harmful economic policies. Second, the duties in place so far — including a 10 per cent universal tariff — have not yet had a significant impact on inflation or economic growth."}],[{"start":145.9,"text":"Both narratives are worryingly rose-tinted. It still requires a leap of faith to assume Trump will back away from implementing tariffs on August 1. Last week the president claimed that his import duties had been “very well received”, citing the stock market reaction."}],[{"start":166.09,"text":"America’s current economic performance is also a poor indicator of how it may fare in the coming months. Stockpiling has helped to restrain the pass-through of tariffs into consumer prices. Numerous companies have withdrawn earnings guidance amid the uncertainty too. Moreover, Trump’s full tariff package is yet to be enacted. The administration is mulling further sector-specific duties, which could pinch the US tech industry, the driving force behind America’s stock market strength. For these reasons, second-quarter company results over the coming weeks ought to be parsed carefully."}],[{"start":210.08,"text":"Broader policy risks have also grown. Last week, the White House accused the Federal Reserve chair, Jay Powell, of “grossly” mismanaging a refurbishment of the central bank’s headquarters. That opened a new front in the administration’s destabilising attacks on the central bank’s independence. Trump’s deficit-raising budget bill is adding to concerns over the sustainability of America’s public finances. The economy is losing momentum too: the jobs market is cooling and consumer spending has weakened."}],[{"start":247.46,"text":"Corporate America has shown its resilience by confounding the gloomiest forecasts so far, and Trump might once again chicken out. But the heightened uncertainty alone is enough reason for investors to exercise caution. A correction from current heights would be painful: stock markets are heavily concentrated and the share of household assets held in equities is also near a historic high. Right now, US stocks appear priced for the most optimistic of outcomes. With a capricious leader in the White House, that looks more like blind faith than rational thinking."}],[{"start":297.49,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1752548193_2552.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

可口可乐考虑出售咖世家咖啡

英国连锁店因成本上升及高端竞争对手崛起而受挫。

波士顿咨询因加沙援助工作遭遇内部反弹

顶级中东顾问对曝光内容感到“羞愧”,首席执行官在迪拜召开的员工会议引发了集体离场。

超大盘科技股动摇之际,投资者将目光投向标普指数中“被遗忘的493只”股票

在经历长期落后之后,等权重投资组合近日跑赢主要指数。

英语如何让英国人付出代价

拥有“世界通用语”的弊端。

当手机都能代劳,你为什么还要学外语?

学习外语很难,用AI很容易,但亨利•曼斯认为回报值得付出。

塑造普京战争的神话

蒂莫西•斯奈德认为,阿拉斯加峰会揭示了推动乌克兰战争的错误历史与个人虚荣。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×