Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

一周展望:通胀上升会扰乱英国央行的降息计划吗?

英国央行自2024年夏季以来已四次下调利率,但对物价再次飙升的担忧可能抑制英国央行进一步采取行动。

瑞士鞋履新秀On公司大举押注中国市场

在网球巨星费德勒支持下,快速成长的运动鞋制造商加入了从耐克和阿迪达斯手中争夺全球市场份额的品牌行列。

英伟达寻求将业务拓展到大型科技公司之外

芯片制造商正与各国和“新云”建立合作关系,力图减少对微软、亚马逊和谷歌的依赖。

全球供应链因中国稀土短缺而面临威胁

在新制度下,许可发放的延迟使从电动汽车到战斗机等产品所需的关键材料运输面临风险。

港股跑赢大陆股市,创2008年以来最大幅度

对中国经济的担忧和对香港科技股的热情推动了从大陆流入香港的创纪录的高流量。

AI聊天机器人如何评价自己的老板和竞争对手?

领先的模型对其开发者阿谀奉承,对竞争对手则持批评态度,但在一件事上所有的AI都意见一致:AI领袖的卓越才华。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×