Shrinking to greatness never goes out of style | 通过拆分和精简来实现卓越,这种策略永远不会过时 - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT英语电台

Shrinking to greatness never goes out of style
通过拆分和精简来实现卓越,这种策略永远不会过时

US industrial group Honeywell is restructuring to align with the times
美国工业集团霍尼韦尔正在重组以顺应时代潮流。
00:00

Honeywell remained a conglomerate long after it was cool. General Electric, Danaher, Alcoa, 3M and United Technologies have all split into smaller chunks to be nimbler and more valuable. Now, the 119-year-old company behind the invention of autopilot and unleaded petrol is carving itself up to better fit the zeitgeist.

In Honeywell’s case, a prod was needed. Activist investor Elliott Management popped up last November calling for chief Vimal Kapur to wield the axe. Now three months later Elliott has what it wanted, without even having to push for a board seat, summon an emergency shareholder meeting or enter into a poison pen battle with the company’s management.

Few companies lend themselves so easily to a split. Honeywell has three parts: aerospace systems, process automation and materials. They have different customers, different product cycles, and don’t much interact. As Elliott pointed out, each has listed peers trading at higher valuations than Honeywell. Analysts at Citigroup argue the parts are worth about $280 per share — a third more than today.

undefined

That hidden value remains hidden. Honeywell shares fell 5.6 per cent on Wednesday as it reported earnings. But consider GE, an even older conglomerate that completed its own three-way split last year. A holder of GE shares in 2021, when the partition was announced, has now tripled their money. Yet the shares went almost nowhere until the break-up began in earnest. Similarly, Honeywell’s dissection could take almost two years.

Honeywell’s share price might get some help, if potential acquirers take Kapur’s plans as an opportunity to start talks. Aerospace could be a good fit with GE’s engine business — reviving a combination the two attempted back in 2000. GE boss Larry Culp, a dab hand at corporate turnarounds, would be a safe pair of hands to run the combination. Honeywell’s automation business could click with rival Rockwell Automation.

It’s true that de-conglomeration sometimes works better in theory than in practice, especially if the underlying businesses face tough times. Look at Dow and Dupont, which went from two to one to three — with Dupont now planning to demerge again — all with little obvious gain for shareholders. GE did well, but its split coincided with a pick-up in the market for its jet engines and turbines.

Even so, focus beats sprawl. Perhaps one day that will also dawn on industries where conglomeration is still very much in fashion. Silicon Valley companies such as Amazon, Meta and Alphabet are now the ones branching out into only loosely complementary industries, from satellites to virtual reality headsets to driverless taxis. Investors generally reward or ignore this, as Honeywell’s once did. What’s old is new.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

大型科技公司为何在英国煽动动荡?

埃隆•马斯克在贝尔法斯特、南安普顿及更广泛地区放大反移民情绪的做法,不能仅用意识形态来解释。

乌克兰和平窗口不会永远敞开

目前有机会让这场冲突“冻结”,但普京对“完全胜利”的幻想可能会成为障碍。

拉丁美洲的世界杯球衣如何沦为政治工具

极右翼民粹主义者已经把自家阵营的队服当成标志性符号,而左翼正试图夺回这块阵地。

欧洲股票具备美国同行无法匹敌的“和平红利”

如果伊朗冲突引发的能源短缺缓解,欧洲公司在复苏方面将获益更多。

哈利•波特毁了英国

我们最宝贵的资产已经被魔法部挪用。

为什么我们彼此不再交流?

与聊天机器人对话永远无法带来同样的人类滋养。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×