Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson

From Rowan Hill, Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

Like a lot of people, I’ve been dabbling with OpenAI’s ChatGPT with varying seriousness for about 12 months.

“Make me a 12-week marathon training plan”, “Create me a six-week marathon training plan”, “Make a photo of me as the next Pope”, “Is it possible to run a marathon without any training?”

When the platform went kaput this month, I was midway through writing an application for a voluntary role with an academic magazine. I’ve scoffed at accounts of students using artificial intelligence to get through college, deriding them for only cheating themselves. In my own much superior and honest scholarly pursuits, I only ever used it to source articles . . . or plan . . . and sometimes reference . . . or clean up those long sentences that don’t really go anywhere, nor make the point you want to make, but roll on and on for far too long, eating up word count.

As a result of the blackout, however, I ended up with two very different halves of an application. The first, produced with ChatGPT’s help, sounded like something I’d written, if you ignored a few of the more exotic word choices and overlooked the box-ticking style of the answers. It did everything the question had asked of it, and it wasn’t necessarily a fabrication.

The second wasn’t as polished. Pulitzer-worthy accounts of my leadership and prowess in adversity made way for honest accounts of my achievements. Sentences were clipped and to the point. At the end, I realised there were a few ideas that I’d missed but just couldn’t shoehorn them in. But it was definitely me talking about me.

An obsession with performance is continuously being maximised, from schools to the workplace to public services. But at what cost? Tim Harford’s Undercover Economist column “Shared values over profit” (Spectrum, June 7) and his account of Alasdair MacIntyre’s “tale of two fishing crews”, illustrated the perils of this fascination excellently. The first crew is driven by nothing but profit. The second allows time for the cultivation of character and human connection within the team, yet often comes out on top.

ChatGPT’s outage opened my own eyes to how I’d sleepwalked, slowly but surely, into believing maximum utility was somehow better than sticking to my values. This dilemma isn’t just an issue for business; it’s a challenge for individuals too.

Rowan Hill

Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

酶研究显示量子计算向药物发现迈进一步

科学家已利用这项技术模拟蛋白质分子的行为

欢迎来到“大蛰伏”时代

为什么没有更多人辞职?

“迷因股之王”大胆收购eBay能否成功?

瑞安•科恩正试图促成一笔560亿美元的交易,将视频游戏零售商“游戏驿站”与在线市场eBay合并。

为什么施罗德家族选择出售

在家族掌门人去世与美国巨头基金崛起之后,英国最大的独立资产管理公司被出售。

公司威胁涨价,消费者将面临更多痛苦

高管警告称,若能源冲击持续,企业将面临更大压力,把成本转嫁给客户。

中国收紧对生产商竞争的监管后,太阳能电池板价格上涨

在一场令头部厂商亏损惨重的价格战之后,价格反弹或将宣告“电池价格不断走低”时代的终结。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×