Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Letter: ChatGPT outage taught this AI dabbler a valuable lesson

From Rowan Hill, Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

Like a lot of people, I’ve been dabbling with OpenAI’s ChatGPT with varying seriousness for about 12 months.

“Make me a 12-week marathon training plan”, “Create me a six-week marathon training plan”, “Make a photo of me as the next Pope”, “Is it possible to run a marathon without any training?”

When the platform went kaput this month, I was midway through writing an application for a voluntary role with an academic magazine. I’ve scoffed at accounts of students using artificial intelligence to get through college, deriding them for only cheating themselves. In my own much superior and honest scholarly pursuits, I only ever used it to source articles . . . or plan . . . and sometimes reference . . . or clean up those long sentences that don’t really go anywhere, nor make the point you want to make, but roll on and on for far too long, eating up word count.

As a result of the blackout, however, I ended up with two very different halves of an application. The first, produced with ChatGPT’s help, sounded like something I’d written, if you ignored a few of the more exotic word choices and overlooked the box-ticking style of the answers. It did everything the question had asked of it, and it wasn’t necessarily a fabrication.

The second wasn’t as polished. Pulitzer-worthy accounts of my leadership and prowess in adversity made way for honest accounts of my achievements. Sentences were clipped and to the point. At the end, I realised there were a few ideas that I’d missed but just couldn’t shoehorn them in. But it was definitely me talking about me.

An obsession with performance is continuously being maximised, from schools to the workplace to public services. But at what cost? Tim Harford’s Undercover Economist column “Shared values over profit” (Spectrum, June 7) and his account of Alasdair MacIntyre’s “tale of two fishing crews”, illustrated the perils of this fascination excellently. The first crew is driven by nothing but profit. The second allows time for the cultivation of character and human connection within the team, yet often comes out on top.

ChatGPT’s outage opened my own eyes to how I’d sleepwalked, slowly but surely, into believing maximum utility was somehow better than sticking to my values. This dilemma isn’t just an issue for business; it’s a challenge for individuals too.

Rowan Hill

Hazel Grove, Cheshire, UK

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

伦敦的私密会员社交场景正在壮大——只是别叫它们“俱乐部”

尽管有报道称富裕人群正从英国出走,一类新型机构仍在纷纷开门迎客。

杰米•李•柯蒂斯:我的天赋是对生命的热爱

在步入花甲后“解放天性”、又抱回奥斯卡小金人,这位演员的事业一路飙升——她正尽情享受这股热潮。

恐怖游戏马为何吓坏了审查者?

Steam拒绝上架该作品,显示出游戏在探索令人不安的思想方面,仍不如书籍和电影那样自由。

权道亨的陨落之路

在法庭上,我们目睹一位纽约法官先是严厉抨击、继而剖析这位Terraform Labs联合创始人的戏剧性崛起与陨落。

韩国高风险偏好散户须先观看培训视频方可交易

韩国监管机构拟强化对散户交易者的监管。

阿波罗押注做空软件企业

因担忧来自AI的威胁,这家私募资本巨头做空贷款并削减对该行业的敞口。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×