With Gareth Southgate, we’ve gone from ‘Dear England’ to ‘dear me’ - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

With Gareth Southgate, we’ve gone from ‘Dear England’ to ‘dear me’

Fans are demanding more but the manager still admirably refuses to blame anyone but himself
00:00

Do you know who I feel sorry for? The National Theatre. Next March it opens a new run of Dear England, James Graham’s tribute to the England football manager Gareth Southgate. As things stand, the script will need the intervention of a sensitivity reader.

Southgate’s star is falling. After England’s nil-nil draw against Slovenia on Tuesday, English fans booed and threw empty beer cups at him. This wasn’t defeat (England proceeded to the knockout stages of the European Championships); but it still felt like betrayal.

Maybe the most bitter divorces follow the most intense love affairs. The British public once felt so let down by Tony Blair precisely because it had been so enamoured of him. So too with Southgate.

He hasn’t been just another England manager struggling with the so-called impossible job. After taking charge in 2016, he became the sweetheart of the nation — or at least of its centrist dads. He showed that you can wear a waistcoat when you’re not at a wedding or a snooker table. Now he risks putting us off knitted polo shirts forever.

Our love affair was born of a particular moment. By 2016, England fans had all hope squeezed out of them. Southgate used the low expectations to relax his players. “We really probably are not going to win this World Cup,” his character tells them in Dear England.

It was also a moment when Conservative MPs were going gently insane, fuming about things like the BBC’s annual report having only one union jack. Southgate articulated a non-Brexity patriotism. He backed his players’ support for social change, writing: “I have never believed that we should just stick to football. ”

Results were secondary, but good: England made the World Cup semi-finals and then the final of Euro 2020. They even won a penalty shootout.

The problem is that fans now want more. They’re no longer satisfied by players who take the knee and frolic in swimming pools on inflatable unicorns. They’re ready to win. And they suspect Southgate is tactically inadequate.

England have the players of the season for Europe’s top two leagues: Manchester City’s Phil Foden and Real Madrid’s Jude Bellingham. Yet their build-up play has been as slick as Joe Biden’s debate answers; their passes as accurately targeted as Donald Trump’s fundraising emails. We’ve gone from Dear England to dear me.

Still, the abuse hurled at Southgate is part of a sad trend. In this week’s TV debate between Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer, an audience member asked mockingly: “Are you two really the best we’ve got to be the next prime minister of our great country? ”Does everything have to be so coarse, so complaining?

But it’s not over. At the 1990 World Cup, England drew their first game. The Daily Mail asked: “Have you ever witnessed a more embarrassing exhibition of wasted energy and spilled adrenalin in the history of ball games? ”England went on memorably to reach the semis. Their manager, Bobby Robson, ended up knighted and adored.

Southgate’s team may not be as bad as they have looked. In three matches at the Euros, they have given away no clear-cut chances from open-play; the only goal they’ve conceded is a 30-yard strike. “Defences, rather than attacks, tend to win tournaments, and England have actually been very solid,” tactical analyst Michael Cox has said.

Like Robson, Southgate has maintained his dignity. While the Netherlands’ coach Ronald Koeman has blamed his players for not running in the right positions, Southgate has only blamed himself. On Tuesday, the beer cups landed near him only because he had gone over to thank the fans. You feel sure he will never sell out. But if the team loses on Sunday against Slovakia, it’s possible that neither will Dear England.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

企业能否利用特朗普关税的差异?

根据“原产地规则”,转移产品供应链的部分环节可能节省大量关税支出,但试图利用这一点也伴随着风险。

“市场的一次再平衡”:福克斯新闻如何报道特朗普的贸易战

作为美国保守派人士的首选新闻来源,福克斯新闻的主持人似乎在很大程度上淡化了特朗普关税造成的冲击。

美国关税威胁到全球企业近2万亿美元的投资承诺

供应链易受全面关税影响的企业一直希望通过谈判获得华盛顿方面的让步。

愤怒的加拿大人取消赴美旅行,美国度假胜地恐将迎来萧条

特朗普发出的吞并加拿大及加征关税的威胁,打击了美国的最大国际旅游市场。

非行行长:非洲“碳掠夺”取代了“土地掠夺”

非洲开发银行行长阿金武米•阿德西纳表示,外国公司为非洲碳截存支付的价格过低。

美国即将与刚果民主共和国达成关键矿产协议

特朗普的非洲顾问同意推动美国矿业投资的“前进道路”,齐塞克迪政府正在寻求巩固支持。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×